trouble (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
trouble) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
a_reader_is_me2011-12-31 10:18 pm
trouble) wrote in a_reader_is_me2011-12-31 10:18 pm
Entry tags:
Pre-2012 Check In & Book 1/50
Hello, a_reader_is_me people! I signed up for this community about a million years ago (or so it seems... Oh, those happy days of 2010), and am combining two things in order to actually make my reading challenge happen: my desire (as posted in my intro) to read 50 history books about the experiences of people of colour in Canada, and my PhD Comps reading. (My Canadian history required comps list is a bit light on race & ethnicity, but I have a lot of lee-way in my optional reading.)
That said, a book! Required reading:
Title: Sweatshop Strife: Class, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Jewish Labour Movement of Toronto, 1900-1939
Author: Ruth A. Frager
Number of Pages: 300, including index, appendix, notes, bibliography, picture credits, not including several pages of black & white photos.
Genre: labour history
Book Number/Goal: 1 of 50
Review:
(Also posted at GoodReads and in the moderation queue atbooks
This history book focuses on the activities of Jewish people in the needle trade between 1900 and 1939. It includes an ethnic, gender, and class-based analysis of the labour movement in Toronto, with a particular focus on Communism's influence.
Frager highlights effectively the reasons why Jewish women had low participation rates in the general labour movement, the Jewish-specific labour movement, and the general feminist movement in Canada. In particular she brings attention to how the middle-class Anglo-Celtic maternal feminism would be unappealing to working class Jewish women who were not subject to the ideas of "lady-like behaviour" and "the cult of true womanhood" that were its primary focus.
Frager also highlights the gender divide within the needle trade in particular. Women were considered unskilled labourers as most women knew how to sew: striking workers could be easily replaced with other "unskilled" workers. (This mirrors similar experiences in "unskilled" labourer jobs held by men. "Unskilled" work was the most similar to work men and boys would have done on the farm.) As such, more skilled jobs - and higher paying ones - were held by men. As such, men might not strike over labour issues most affecting women. One notable exception is when male garment workers were going to have addition sewing jobs without additional pay, but at the expense of their "sister" workers. Frager describes this as male self-interest coinciding with female labour needs, and both men and women went out on strike.
I did not find this as engaging a work as I would have liked. Frager divides her discussions up thematically, and although I understand her decision to do so, I don't think the end product was effective. Even within the same chapter, the narrative traveled back and forth in time, and it was difficult to see cause-and-effect, particularly with strike actions. As well, there was a great deal of repetition and reminders of specific events. Other authors (most notably Laurel Thatcher Ulrich) have been able to lay out arguments both thematically and chronologically very effectively, and this work suffers because of that lack.
On the other hand, I did enjoy Frager's pointed highlighting of issues regarding how feminism has historically been less effective in engaging with working-class and "ethnic" issues. Feminism in Canada had a Christian foundation, which made it alienating (and alienated from) non-Christian women in particular.
Frager does dedicate a full chapter to highlighting the experiences and life stories of several female Jewish labour activists. I enjoyed this, but would have liked to see a similar chapter dedicated to highlighting male Jewish labour activists as well. This may seem like a boorish "but what about the men", but my concern is that many male activists are discussed throughout the work, but their life stories are difficult to pin together. Interweaving women throughout the work and including a chapter on male activists would have been more effective on both fronts.
Regardless, I found this book interesting as a labour history, and could see much application to my own interest in disability-focused history.
a_reader_is_me people! I signed up for this community about a million years ago (or so it seems... Oh, those happy days of 2010), and am combining two things in order to actually make my reading challenge happen: my desire (as posted in my intro) to read 50 history books about the experiences of people of colour in Canada, and my PhD Comps reading. (My Canadian history required comps list is a bit light on race & ethnicity, but I have a lot of lee-way in my optional reading.)That said, a book! Required reading:
Title: Sweatshop Strife: Class, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Jewish Labour Movement of Toronto, 1900-1939
Author: Ruth A. Frager
Number of Pages: 300, including index, appendix, notes, bibliography, picture credits, not including several pages of black & white photos.
Genre: labour history
Book Number/Goal: 1 of 50
Review:
(Also posted at GoodReads and in the moderation queue at
booksThis history book focuses on the activities of Jewish people in the needle trade between 1900 and 1939. It includes an ethnic, gender, and class-based analysis of the labour movement in Toronto, with a particular focus on Communism's influence.
Frager highlights effectively the reasons why Jewish women had low participation rates in the general labour movement, the Jewish-specific labour movement, and the general feminist movement in Canada. In particular she brings attention to how the middle-class Anglo-Celtic maternal feminism would be unappealing to working class Jewish women who were not subject to the ideas of "lady-like behaviour" and "the cult of true womanhood" that were its primary focus.
Frager also highlights the gender divide within the needle trade in particular. Women were considered unskilled labourers as most women knew how to sew: striking workers could be easily replaced with other "unskilled" workers. (This mirrors similar experiences in "unskilled" labourer jobs held by men. "Unskilled" work was the most similar to work men and boys would have done on the farm.) As such, more skilled jobs - and higher paying ones - were held by men. As such, men might not strike over labour issues most affecting women. One notable exception is when male garment workers were going to have addition sewing jobs without additional pay, but at the expense of their "sister" workers. Frager describes this as male self-interest coinciding with female labour needs, and both men and women went out on strike.
I did not find this as engaging a work as I would have liked. Frager divides her discussions up thematically, and although I understand her decision to do so, I don't think the end product was effective. Even within the same chapter, the narrative traveled back and forth in time, and it was difficult to see cause-and-effect, particularly with strike actions. As well, there was a great deal of repetition and reminders of specific events. Other authors (most notably Laurel Thatcher Ulrich) have been able to lay out arguments both thematically and chronologically very effectively, and this work suffers because of that lack.
On the other hand, I did enjoy Frager's pointed highlighting of issues regarding how feminism has historically been less effective in engaging with working-class and "ethnic" issues. Feminism in Canada had a Christian foundation, which made it alienating (and alienated from) non-Christian women in particular.
Frager does dedicate a full chapter to highlighting the experiences and life stories of several female Jewish labour activists. I enjoyed this, but would have liked to see a similar chapter dedicated to highlighting male Jewish labour activists as well. This may seem like a boorish "but what about the men", but my concern is that many male activists are discussed throughout the work, but their life stories are difficult to pin together. Interweaving women throughout the work and including a chapter on male activists would have been more effective on both fronts.
Regardless, I found this book interesting as a labour history, and could see much application to my own interest in disability-focused history.